Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1: −
= Goal Contagion Theory =
+
=Acronym=
 
  −
= Acronym =
   
GCT
 
GCT
   −
= Alternate name(s) =
+
=Alternate name(s)=
 
N/A
 
N/A
   −
= Main dependent construct(s)/factor(s) =
+
=Main dependent construct(s)/factor(s)=
 
Goal contagion, Intention to adopt innovative IT
 
Goal contagion, Intention to adopt innovative IT
   −
= Main independent construct(s)/factor(s) =
+
=Main independent construct(s)/factor(s)=
 
Social comparison orientation, knowledge ambiguity construct for firm, social influence, user’s perceived knowledge of the innovative IT used by a firm.
 
Social comparison orientation, knowledge ambiguity construct for firm, social influence, user’s perceived knowledge of the innovative IT used by a firm.
   −
= Concise description of theory =
+
=Concise description of theory=
 
The Goal Contagion theory is defined as the automatic adoption and pursuit of goals that others perceive and attempts to attain them. Unlike other goal theories, in goal contagion theory the goal-directed behavior does not have the conscious involvement, and hence automatic adoption occurs. Additionally, goal contagion is seen as a process in which individuals perceive or catch goals from others behavior, and yet the social perception more often driven from the broader contexts surrounding others, and these contexts are adequate enough to drive the goal inferences (Leander & Shah, 2013).  
 
The Goal Contagion theory is defined as the automatic adoption and pursuit of goals that others perceive and attempts to attain them. Unlike other goal theories, in goal contagion theory the goal-directed behavior does not have the conscious involvement, and hence automatic adoption occurs. Additionally, goal contagion is seen as a process in which individuals perceive or catch goals from others behavior, and yet the social perception more often driven from the broader contexts surrounding others, and these contexts are adequate enough to drive the goal inferences (Leander & Shah, 2013).  
   Line 20: Line 18:  
In the context of behavioral research, goal contagion theory can be used to examine the effects of adoption timing of digital technologies. Two imperative factors influencing goal contagion are other’s behaviors and the situational context. In IS research, goal contagion is considered as a prominent theory that may help in understanding the adoption of the innovative information technologies.  
 
In the context of behavioral research, goal contagion theory can be used to examine the effects of adoption timing of digital technologies. Two imperative factors influencing goal contagion are other’s behaviors and the situational context. In IS research, goal contagion is considered as a prominent theory that may help in understanding the adoption of the innovative information technologies.  
   −
= Diagram/schematic of theory =
+
=Diagram/schematic of theory=
   −
= Originating author(s) =
+
=Originating author(s)=
 
Henk Aarts, Peter M. Gollwitzer, Ran R. Hassin
 
Henk Aarts, Peter M. Gollwitzer, Ran R. Hassin
   −
= Seminal articles =
+
=Seminal articles=
 
Aarts, H., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Hassin, R. R. (2004). ''Goal Contagion: Perceiving Is for Pursuing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(1), 23–37.'' doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.23  
 
Aarts, H., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Hassin, R. R. (2004). ''Goal Contagion: Perceiving Is for Pursuing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(1), 23–37.'' doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.23  
    
Leander, N. P., & Shah, J. Y. (2013). For Whom the Goals Loom: Context-Driven Goal Contagion. Social Cognition, 31(2), 187–200. doi:10.1521/soco.2013.31.2.187  
 
Leander, N. P., & Shah, J. Y. (2013). For Whom the Goals Loom: Context-Driven Goal Contagion. Social Cognition, 31(2), 187–200. doi:10.1521/soco.2013.31.2.187  
   −
= Level of analysis =
+
=Level of analysis=
 
Individual, Organizational level
 
Individual, Organizational level
   −
= Links from this theory to other theories =
+
= Links to WWW sites describing theory =
 +
N/A
 +
 
 +
=Links from this theory to other theories=
 
Goal-setting theory
 
Goal-setting theory
   −
= IS articles that use the theory =
+
=IS articles that use the theory=
 
Namyeon Lee, Sinan Li, Bongsik Shin & Ohbyung Kwon (2016) Social Comparison, Goal Contagion, and Adoption of Innovative Information Technology, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 56:2, 127-136, DOI: 10.1080/08874417.2016.1117374
 
Namyeon Lee, Sinan Li, Bongsik Shin & Ohbyung Kwon (2016) Social Comparison, Goal Contagion, and Adoption of Innovative Information Technology, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 56:2, 127-136, DOI: 10.1080/08874417.2016.1117374
    
Geels, Kasha, Stephen Rice, and Eric Johnson. 2011. "The Contagion of Emotion, Perception, and Goal-directed Behavior through Symbolic Environments." The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge, and Society 7 (1): 79-92. doi:10.18848/1832-3669/CGP/v07i01/56166.
 
Geels, Kasha, Stephen Rice, and Eric Johnson. 2011. "The Contagion of Emotion, Perception, and Goal-directed Behavior through Symbolic Environments." The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge, and Society 7 (1): 79-92. doi:10.18848/1832-3669/CGP/v07i01/56166.
   −
= External Links =
+
=External Links=
 
https://scholar.google.co.in/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&as_vis=1&q=Goal+Contagion+theory&btnG= (Google Scholar link)
 
https://scholar.google.co.in/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&as_vis=1&q=Goal+Contagion+theory&btnG= (Google Scholar link)
   −
= Original Contributor(s) =
+
=Contributor(s)=
 
Mohammed Nawazish, Doctoral Student at Indian Institute of Management, Kozhikode, India.
 
Mohammed Nawazish, Doctoral Student at Indian Institute of Management, Kozhikode, India.
 +
 +
= Date last updated =
 +
19/10/2020 Please feel free to make modifications to this site. In order to do so, you must register.
17

edits

Navigation menu