Difference between pages "Main Page" and "Actor network theory"

From IS Theory
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(removing stale news)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Sponsor Thumbs}}
 
{{Sponsor Thumbs}}
  
<div id="mainpage_topbox">
 
<div id="mainpage_pagetitle">'''Welcome to the <span id="mainpage_mwtitle">Theories Used in IS Research Wiki</span>'''</div>
 
<div class="mainpage_boxcontents">
 
{{Introduction}}
 
  
{{Citing}}
+
== '''Actor network theory''' ==
</div>
+
----
 +
== Acronym ==
 +
ANT
 +
== Alternate name(s)==
 +
N/A
 +
== Main dependent construct(s)/factor(s)==
 +
N/A
 +
== Main independent construct(s)/factor(s) ==
 +
Key terms: actor, network, translation, problemization, OPP, interessement, enrollment, inscription, irreversibility
 +
== Concise description of theory ==
 +
Actor-network theory, sometimes abbreviated to ANT, is a sociological theory developed by Bruno Latour, Michel Callon and John Law. It is distinguished from other network theories in that an actor-network contains not merely people, but objects and organizations. These are collectively referred to as actors, or sometimes actants.
 +
 +
The primary tenet of actor-network theory is the concept of the heterogenous network. That is, a network containing many dissimilar elements. These coextensive networks comprise of both social and technical parts. Moreover, the social and technical are treated as inseparable by ANT. When buying produce from a supermarket, for example, the actor-network involved would include the purchaser and the cashier, as well as the cash register, the money and the produce involved. It also includes other, less obvious objects, such as the clothes the purchaser wears, without which they would most likely not be served. The task of trying to identify all of the heterogeneous elements in an actor-network like this can be difficult, and is ultimately up to the discretion of the researcher. This is known as the problem of selection.
 +
 +
Actor-network theory claims that any actor, whether person, object (including computer software, hardware, and technical standards), or organization, is equally important to a social network. As such, societal order is an effect caused by an actor network running smoothly. This order begins to break down when certain actors are removed. For example, the removal of telephones, banks or the president may all result in significant break-downs in social order.
 +
 +
Source: Wikipedia ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actor_network_theory<nowiki>])</nowiki><br>
 +
<br>
 +
== Diagram/schematic of theory ==
 +
N/A
 +
== Originating author(s) ==
 +
Bruno Latour, Michel Callon, John Law
 +
== Seminal articles ==
 +
Callon, M. (1986a). ‘The Sociology of an Actor-Network: The Case of the Electric Vehicle’. Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology. Callon, M., Law, J. and Rip, A. (Eds). Macmillan Press, London: 19-34.
  
<div id="mainpage_sitelinks">
+
Callon, M. (1986b). ‘Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay’. Power, Action & Belief. A New Sociology of Knowledge? Law, J. (Ed). Routledge & Kegan Paul, London: 196-229.
'''[[IS_Theory:About|About this site]]''' &nbsp; | &nbsp;
 
'''[[IS_Theory:Acknowledgements|Acknowledgements]]''' &nbsp; | &nbsp;
 
'''[[IS_Theory:Contributing|How to Contribute]]'''
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
  
<div id="mainpage_newscell">
+
Callon, M. (1987). ‘Society in the Making: The Study of Technology as a Tool for Sociological Analysis’. The Social Construction of Technological Systems. Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P. and Pinch, T. P. (Eds). The MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma.: 85-103.
<div class="mainpage_boxtitle">
 
<div><b>Highlights</b></div>
 
</div>
 
* '''IS Theories Wiki is now part of the TheorizeIt.org portal.'''
 
*: For construct discovery, try out the internomological network at [http://INN.TheorizeIt.org INN.TheorizeIt.org].
 
*:  
 
</div>
 
  
== Theories ==
+
Callon, M. (1997). ‘Actor-Network Theory - The Market Test (draft)’ Actor Network and After Workshop. Centre for Social Theory and Technology (CSTT), Keele University, UK, http://www.keele.ac.uk/depts/stt/stt/ant/callon.htm, 31 July 1997.
  
*[[Absorptive capacity theory]]
+
Latour, B. (1986). ‘The Powers of Association’. Power, Action and Belief. A new sociology of knowledge? Sociological Review monograph 32. Law, J. (Ed). Routledge & Kegan Paul, London: 264-280.
*[[Actor network theory]]
+
 
*[[Accountability theory]]
+
Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Engineers and Scientists Through Society. Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
*[[Adaptive structuration theory]]
+
 
*[[Administrative behavior, theory of]]
+
Latour, B. (1988a). The Pasteurization of France. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Ma.
*[[Agency theory]]
+
 
*[[Argumentation theory]]
+
Latour, B. (1988b). ‘The Prince for Machines as well as for Machinations’. Technology and Social Process. Elliott, B. (Ed). Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh: 20-43.
*[[Behavioral decision theory]]
+
 
*[[Belief Action Outcome Model|Belief Action Outcome Framework]]
+
Latour, B. (1991). ‘Technology is society made durable’. A Sociology of Monsters. Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. Law, J. (Ed). Routledge, London: 103-131.
*[[Boundary object theory]]
+
 
*[[Chaos theory]]
+
Latour, B. (1997). 'On Actor Network Theory: A few clarifications.' http://www.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-9801/msg00019.html.  
*[[Cognitive dissonance theory]]
+
== Originating area ==
*[[Cognitive fit theory]]
+
Sociology
*[[Cognitive load theory]]
+
== Level of analysis ==
*[[Competitive strategy (Porter)]]
+
Individual, network
*[[Complexity theory]]
+
== IS articles that use the theory ==
*[[Contingency theory]]
+
Bijker, W. and J. Law (eds.) (1994) Shaping technology / building society: studies in sociotechnical change, Cambridge Ma: The MIT Press.
*[[Critical realism theory]]
+
 
*[[Critical social theory]]
+
Bloomfield, B. P., et al. (1992). "Machines and manoeuvres: Responsibility accounting and the construction of hospital information systems." Accounting, Management and Information Technologies '''2'''(4): 197-219.
*[[Critical success factors, theory of]]
+
 
*[[Customer based Discrepancy Theory]]
+
Bloomfield, B. P. and T. Vurdubakis (1994). "Negotiating the Boundary between the Technical and the Social in the Development of IT Systems." Information Technology & People '''7'''(1): 9-24.
*[[Customer Focus Theory]]
+
 
*[[Deferred action, theory of]]
+
Bonner, W (Bill). T. and M. Chiasson (2005). "If fair information principles are the answer, what was the question?: An Actor-Network Theory Investigation of the Modern Constitution of Privacy." Information & Organization '''15'''(4): 267-293.
*[[Delone and McLean IS success model]]
+
 
*[[Design Theory]]
+
Bonner, W (Bill). T., et al. (2009). "Restoring balance: How history tilts the scales against privacy. An Actor-Network Theory investigation." Information & Organization '''19'''(2): 84–102.
*[[Diffusion of innovations theory]]
+
 
*[[Dynamic capabilities]]
+
Bonner, W. B. T. (2013). "History and IS – Broadening our view and understanding: Actor–Network Theory as a methodology " Journal of Information Technology '''28'''(2): 111-123.
*[[Elaboration likelihood model]]
+
 
*[[Embodied social presence theory]]
+
Doolin, B. and A. Lowe (2002). "To reveal is to critique: Actor-network theory and critical information systems research." Journal of Information Technology '''17'''(2): 69-78.
*[[Equity theory]]  
+
 
*[[Evolutionary theory]]
+
Hanseth, O. and E. Monteiro (1997). "Inscribing Behaviour in Information Infrastructure Standards." Accounting, Management and Information Technologies '''7'''(4): 183-211.
*[[Expectation confirmation theory]]
+
 
*[[Feminism theory]]
+
Holmstrom, J. and F. Stalder (2001). "Drifting technologies and multi-purpose networks: the case of the Swedish cashcard." Information & Organization '''11'''(3): 187-206.
*[[Fit-Viability theory]]
+
 
*[[Flow theory]]
+
Kavanagh, D. and L. Araujo (1995). "Chronigami: Folding and unfolding time." Accounting, Management and Information Technologies '''5'''(2): 103-121.
*[[Game theory]]
+
 
*[[Garbage can theory]] 
+
McGrath, K. (2002). "The Golden Circle: a way of arguing and acting about technology in the London Ambulance Service." European Journal of Information Systems '''11'''(4): 251-266.          
*[[General systems theory]]
+
 
*[[General deterrence theory]]
+
Larsen, T., L. Levine, and J. I. DeGross (Eds.) (1999) Information systems: current issues and future changes, Laxenburg: IFIP.
*[[General Strain Theory|General Strain theory]]
+
 
*[[Hedonic-motivation system adoption model (HMSAM)]]
+
McMaster, T., E. Mumford, E. B. Swanson, B. Warboys et al. (Eds.) (1997) Facilitating technology transfer through partnership: Learning from practice and research, London: Chapman and Hall.
*[[Hermeneutics]]
+
 
*[[Illusion of control]]
+
Orlikowski, W., G. Walsham, M. Jones, and J. I. DeGross (Eds.) (1996) Information technology and changes in organizational work, London: Chapman and Hall.
*[[Impression management, theory of]]
+
 
*[[Information processing theory]]
+
Sarker, S., Sarker, S., and Sidorova, A. "Understanding Business Process Change Failure: An Actor-Network Perspective," Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS), Vol. 23, No. 1, Summer 2006, pp. 51-86.
*[[Institutional theory]]
+
 
*[[International information systems theory]]
+
Sawyer, S., and Jarrahi, M. H. 2014. Sociotechnical Approaches to the Study of Information Systems. In A. Tucker, & H. Topi (Eds.), Computing Handbook: Information systems and information technology, 3rd Edition. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
*[[Kellers Motivational Model |Keller's Motivational Model]]
+
 
*[[Knowledge-based theory of the firm]]
+
Scott, SV and Wagner EL, (2003) "Networks, negotiations and new times: The implementation of enterprise resource planning into an academic administration," Information and Organization, v.13, issue 4, pp. 285-313.
*[[Language action perspective]] 
+
 
*[[Lemon Market Theory|Information asymmetry theory (lemon market)]]
+
Strathern, M. (1999) “What is intellectual property after?,” in  J. Law and J. Hassard (Eds.) Actor Network Theory and After, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers / The Sociological Review,  pp. 156-180.
*[[Management fashion theory]]
+
 
*[[Media richness theory]]
+
Walsham, G. (1997) “Actor-Network Theory and IS research: Current status and future prospects,” in  A. S. Lee, J. Liebenau, and J. I. DeGross (Eds.)  Information systems and qualitative research, London: Chapman and Hall,  pp. 466-480.
*[[Media synchronicity theory]]
+
 
*[[Modal aspects, theory of]]
+
Walsham, G. and Sahay, S. 1999. GIS for district-level administration in India: problems and opportunities. MIS Quarterly. 23, 1 (Mar. 1999), 39-65.
*[[Multi-attribute utility theory]] 
+
== Links from this theory to other theories ==
*[[Multi-motive information systems continuance model (MISC)]]
+
[[Social network theory]], [[Socio-technical theory]], network theory
*[[Organizational culture theory]]
+
 
*[[Organizational information processing theory]]
+
== External links ==
*[[Organizational knowledge creation]]
+
http://www.learning-theories.com/actor-network-theory-ant.html, Summary of ANT by Learning-theories.com.
*[[Organizational learning theory]]
+
 
*[[Portfolio theory]]
+
http://www.idi.ntnu.no/~ericm/ant.FINAL.htm, Eric Monteiro's summary of ANT and information infrastructure.
*[[Process virtualization theory]]
+
 
*[[Prospect theory]]
+
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/actor-network-theory/, ANT theory group discussion site on Yahoo.
*[[Protection motivation theory (NEW entry!)|Protection motivation theory]]
+
 
*[[Punctuated equilibrium theory]]
+
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actor_network_theory, Wikipedia entry on ANT.
*[[Real options theory]]
+
 
*[[Resource-based view of the firm]]
+
== Original Contributor(s) ==
*[[Resource dependency theory]]
+
Mike Wade
*[[Selective organizational information privacy and security violations model (SOIPSVM)]]
+
 
*[[Self-efficacy theory]]
+
<br>
*[[SERVQUAL]]
+
<br>
*[[Signaling|Signaling theory]]
+
Please feel free to make modifications to this site. In order to do so, you must register.
*[[Social Bond Theory]]
+
<br>
*[[Social capital theory]]
+
<br>
*[[Social cognitive theory]]
+
[[Main Page | Return to Theories Used in IS Research]]
*[[Social exchange theory]]
 
*[[Social Influence Theory]] (of Kelman)
 
*[[Social learning theory]]
 
*[[Social network theory]]
 
*[[Social shaping of technology]]
 
*[[Socio-technical theory]]
 
*[[Soft systems theory]]
 
*[[Stakeholder theory]] 
 
*[[Structuration theory]]
 
*[[Structured process modeling theory (SPMT)]]
 
*[[Task closure theory]] 
 
*[[Task-technology fit]]
 
*[[Technological frames of reference]]
 
*[[Technology acceptance model]]
 
*[[Technology dominance, theory of]]
 
*[[Technology-organization-environment framework]]
 
*[[Technology Threat Avoidance Theory (TTAT)|Technology Threat Avoidance Theory]]
 
*[[Theory of collective action]]
 
*[[Theory of planned behavior]]
 
*[[Theory of reasoned action]]
 
*[[Theory of slack resources (TSR)|Theory of slack resources]]
 
*[[Transaction cost economics]]
 
*[[Transactive memory theory]]
 
*[[Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology]]
 
*[[Usage control model]]
 
*[[Work systems theory]]
 
*[[Yield shift theory of satisfaction]]
 

Latest revision as of 17:49, 7 July 2017

This site is sponsored by the University of Colorado


Actor network theory


Acronym

ANT

Alternate name(s)

N/A

Main dependent construct(s)/factor(s)

N/A

Main independent construct(s)/factor(s)

Key terms: actor, network, translation, problemization, OPP, interessement, enrollment, inscription, irreversibility

Concise description of theory

Actor-network theory, sometimes abbreviated to ANT, is a sociological theory developed by Bruno Latour, Michel Callon and John Law. It is distinguished from other network theories in that an actor-network contains not merely people, but objects and organizations. These are collectively referred to as actors, or sometimes actants.

The primary tenet of actor-network theory is the concept of the heterogenous network. That is, a network containing many dissimilar elements. These coextensive networks comprise of both social and technical parts. Moreover, the social and technical are treated as inseparable by ANT. When buying produce from a supermarket, for example, the actor-network involved would include the purchaser and the cashier, as well as the cash register, the money and the produce involved. It also includes other, less obvious objects, such as the clothes the purchaser wears, without which they would most likely not be served. The task of trying to identify all of the heterogeneous elements in an actor-network like this can be difficult, and is ultimately up to the discretion of the researcher. This is known as the problem of selection.

Actor-network theory claims that any actor, whether person, object (including computer software, hardware, and technical standards), or organization, is equally important to a social network. As such, societal order is an effect caused by an actor network running smoothly. This order begins to break down when certain actors are removed. For example, the removal of telephones, banks or the president may all result in significant break-downs in social order.

Source: Wikipedia ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actor_network_theory])

Diagram/schematic of theory

N/A

Originating author(s)

Bruno Latour, Michel Callon, John Law

Seminal articles

Callon, M. (1986a). ‘The Sociology of an Actor-Network: The Case of the Electric Vehicle’. Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology. Callon, M., Law, J. and Rip, A. (Eds). Macmillan Press, London: 19-34.

Callon, M. (1986b). ‘Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay’. Power, Action & Belief. A New Sociology of Knowledge? Law, J. (Ed). Routledge & Kegan Paul, London: 196-229.

Callon, M. (1987). ‘Society in the Making: The Study of Technology as a Tool for Sociological Analysis’. The Social Construction of Technological Systems. Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P. and Pinch, T. P. (Eds). The MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma.: 85-103.

Callon, M. (1997). ‘Actor-Network Theory - The Market Test (draft)’ Actor Network and After Workshop. Centre for Social Theory and Technology (CSTT), Keele University, UK, http://www.keele.ac.uk/depts/stt/stt/ant/callon.htm, 31 July 1997.

Latour, B. (1986). ‘The Powers of Association’. Power, Action and Belief. A new sociology of knowledge? Sociological Review monograph 32. Law, J. (Ed). Routledge & Kegan Paul, London: 264-280.

Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Engineers and Scientists Through Society. Open University Press, Milton Keynes.

Latour, B. (1988a). The Pasteurization of France. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Ma.

Latour, B. (1988b). ‘The Prince for Machines as well as for Machinations’. Technology and Social Process. Elliott, B. (Ed). Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh: 20-43.

Latour, B. (1991). ‘Technology is society made durable’. A Sociology of Monsters. Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. Law, J. (Ed). Routledge, London: 103-131.

Latour, B. (1997). 'On Actor Network Theory: A few clarifications.' http://www.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-9801/msg00019.html.

Originating area

Sociology

Level of analysis

Individual, network

IS articles that use the theory

Bijker, W. and J. Law (eds.) (1994) Shaping technology / building society: studies in sociotechnical change, Cambridge Ma: The MIT Press.

Bloomfield, B. P., et al. (1992). "Machines and manoeuvres: Responsibility accounting and the construction of hospital information systems." Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 2(4): 197-219.

Bloomfield, B. P. and T. Vurdubakis (1994). "Negotiating the Boundary between the Technical and the Social in the Development of IT Systems." Information Technology & People 7(1): 9-24.

Bonner, W (Bill). T. and M. Chiasson (2005). "If fair information principles are the answer, what was the question?: An Actor-Network Theory Investigation of the Modern Constitution of Privacy." Information & Organization 15(4): 267-293.

Bonner, W (Bill). T., et al. (2009). "Restoring balance: How history tilts the scales against privacy. An Actor-Network Theory investigation." Information & Organization 19(2): 84–102.

Bonner, W. B. T. (2013). "History and IS – Broadening our view and understanding: Actor–Network Theory as a methodology " Journal of Information Technology 28(2): 111-123.

Doolin, B. and A. Lowe (2002). "To reveal is to critique: Actor-network theory and critical information systems research." Journal of Information Technology 17(2): 69-78.

Hanseth, O. and E. Monteiro (1997). "Inscribing Behaviour in Information Infrastructure Standards." Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 7(4): 183-211.

Holmstrom, J. and F. Stalder (2001). "Drifting technologies and multi-purpose networks: the case of the Swedish cashcard." Information & Organization 11(3): 187-206.

Kavanagh, D. and L. Araujo (1995). "Chronigami: Folding and unfolding time." Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 5(2): 103-121.

McGrath, K. (2002). "The Golden Circle: a way of arguing and acting about technology in the London Ambulance Service." European Journal of Information Systems 11(4): 251-266.          

Larsen, T., L. Levine, and J. I. DeGross (Eds.) (1999) Information systems: current issues and future changes, Laxenburg: IFIP.

McMaster, T., E. Mumford, E. B. Swanson, B. Warboys et al. (Eds.) (1997) Facilitating technology transfer through partnership: Learning from practice and research, London: Chapman and Hall.

Orlikowski, W., G. Walsham, M. Jones, and J. I. DeGross (Eds.) (1996) Information technology and changes in organizational work, London: Chapman and Hall.

Sarker, S., Sarker, S., and Sidorova, A. "Understanding Business Process Change Failure: An Actor-Network Perspective," Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS), Vol. 23, No. 1, Summer 2006, pp. 51-86.

Sawyer, S., and Jarrahi, M. H. 2014. Sociotechnical Approaches to the Study of Information Systems. In A. Tucker, & H. Topi (Eds.), Computing Handbook: Information systems and information technology, 3rd Edition. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.

Scott, SV and Wagner EL, (2003) "Networks, negotiations and new times: The implementation of enterprise resource planning into an academic administration," Information and Organization, v.13, issue 4, pp. 285-313.

Strathern, M. (1999) “What is intellectual property after?,” in J. Law and J. Hassard (Eds.) Actor Network Theory and After, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers / The Sociological Review, pp. 156-180.

Walsham, G. (1997) “Actor-Network Theory and IS research: Current status and future prospects,” in A. S. Lee, J. Liebenau, and J. I. DeGross (Eds.) Information systems and qualitative research, London: Chapman and Hall, pp. 466-480.

Walsham, G. and Sahay, S. 1999. GIS for district-level administration in India: problems and opportunities. MIS Quarterly. 23, 1 (Mar. 1999), 39-65.

Links from this theory to other theories

Social network theory, Socio-technical theory, network theory

External links

http://www.learning-theories.com/actor-network-theory-ant.html, Summary of ANT by Learning-theories.com.

http://www.idi.ntnu.no/~ericm/ant.FINAL.htm, Eric Monteiro's summary of ANT and information infrastructure.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/actor-network-theory/, ANT theory group discussion site on Yahoo.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actor_network_theory, Wikipedia entry on ANT.

Original Contributor(s)

Mike Wade



Please feel free to make modifications to this site. In order to do so, you must register.

Return to Theories Used in IS Research