Difference between revisions of "Design Theory"

From IS Theory
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== '''Design theory''' ==
 
== '''Design theory''' ==
 
----
 
----
''This theory is waiting to be summarized!''
 
 
 
== Acronym ==
 
== Acronym ==
  
Line 9: Line 7:
  
 
== Main dependent construct(s)/factor(s)==
 
== Main dependent construct(s)/factor(s)==
Subjective measures (e.g. satisfaction, goodness)
 
 
Objective measures (e.g. percentage of improvement in efficiency, number
 
of users)
 
 
 
== Main independent construct(s)/factor(s) ==
 
== Main independent construct(s)/factor(s) ==
Philosophy of design is concerned with the question “what is the purpose of design?”
 
 
Aristotle proposed four causes, four types of answers to the question “why”, and Heidegger showed that Aristotle’s four causes differed from one another (Gregor and Jones, 2007).
 
# C''ausa materialis'' (material or matter)
 
# ''Causa formalis'' (form or shape the material)
 
# ''Causa finalis'' (end)
 
# ''Causa efficiens'' (finished effect)
 
# Artifact mutability
 
# Testable propositions
 
# Expository instantiation
 
 
== Concise description of theory ==
 
== Concise description of theory ==
  
  
 
Design theory involves examining and evaluating design as a concept. A
 
Design theory involves examining and evaluating design as a concept. A
number of scholars in information systems research have examined the concept of
+
number of scholars in information systems research have examined and evaluated the concept of
 
design.  The focus of design
 
design.  The focus of design
 
in information systems is on design of IT artifacts. There
 
in information systems is on design of IT artifacts. There

Revision as of 20:44, 6 April 2015

Design theory


Acronym

Alternate name(s)

Design Research, Design Science

Main dependent construct(s)/factor(s)

Main independent construct(s)/factor(s)

Concise description of theory

Design theory involves examining and evaluating design as a concept. A number of scholars in information systems research have examined and evaluated the concept of design.  The focus of design in information systems is on design of IT artifacts. There are differing opinions about what constitutes design for information technology artifacts. Walls et al. (1992) specify two major components of IT design theories: a product component and a development process component. Each draws upon kernel theories (usually taken from the natural or social sciences) in specifying prescriptive hypotheses that enable designers to evaluate whether the product and its development process satisfy the design theory. Goldkuhl (2004) specifies a need for multiple grounding of design theories in external theories, reference theories, value theories, etc. Markus et al. (2002) take a more practical view of design theories, using these theories to explain the means– ends relationship as a practical, prescriptively causal mechanism to justify design components.

Diagram/schematic of theory

ISR.png

Source: Hevner, A., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS quarterly, 28(1), 75-105.

Originating author(s)

Seminal articles

Weber, R. (1987). Toward a theory of artifacts: a paradigmatic base for information systems research. Journal of Information Systems, 1(2), 3-19.

Walls, J. G., Widmeyer, G. R., & El Sawy, O. A. (1992). Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Information systems research, 3(1), 36-59.

March, S. T., & Smith, G. F. (1995). Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision support systems, 15(4), 251-266.

Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (Vol. 136). MIT press.

Markus, M. L., Majchrzak, A., & Gasser, L. (2002). A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes. Mis Quarterly, 179-212.

Hevner, A., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS quarterly, 28(1), 75-105.

Gregor, S., & Jones, D. (2007). The anatomy of a design theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(5), 312-335.

Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of management information systems, 24(3), 45-77.

Originating area

Philosophy

Level of analysis

Design of an IS artifact

IS articles that use the theory

Links from this theory to other theories

External links

Four causes

Original Contributor(s)

Vishal Uppala

Please feel free to make modifications to this site. In order to do so, you must register.

Return to Theories Used in IS Research