Conservation of resources theory

From IS Theory
Revision as of 13:26, 20 November 2020 by Geethika (talk | contribs) (Created page with " == Acronym == COR == Alternate names == N/A == Main dependent construct(s)/factor(s) == Outcomes of resource loss or gain (for example, emotional exhaustion and engagement)...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search



Alternate names


Main dependent construct(s)/factor(s)

Outcomes of resource loss or gain (for example, emotional exhaustion and engagement), coping behaviors

Main independent construct(s)/factor(s)

Perceived importance of an individual's resources, personal values, perceived resource loss/gain

Concise description of theory

Conservation of resources theory is a stress theory that revolves around individuals’ motivation to protect the available resources and acquire new resources. Individuals conserve and acquire the resources they value. Such resources may include objects, personal characteristics, states, conditions etc.

There are two basic principles of the theory. They are: primacy of resource loss and resource investment. Primacy of resource loss states that it is psychologically harmful for individuals to lose resources than it is helpful for them to gain the lost resources back. The principle of resource investment explains that people invest resources in order to protect against resource loss, to recover from resource loss and to gain resources. This is a complex process that involves many psychological factors.

The theory suggests four corollaries of the resource investment process to understand its complexity. Corollary 1 states that individuals with resources are in a better position to invest those resources. Corollary 2 states that resource loss at an initial stage leads to resource loss at a later stage. Corollary 3 states that resource gains at an initial stage lead to resource gains at a later stage. Corollary 4 states that as individuals lose resources, they try to protect the remaining resources.

Individuals that strive to acquire and build resources experience strain when such resources are lost or when investment of such resources leads to failure of gain. Such loss threats and failures of gain (after resource investment) are viewed as demands in the theory.

Diagram/schematic of theory


Originating author(s)

Stevan E. Hobfoll

Seminal articles

Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. [1]

Hobfoll, S.E., Jackson, A.P. Conservation of resources in community intervention. Am J Commun Psychol 19, 111–121 (1991). [2]

Hobfoll, S. E. 1988. The ecology of stress. New York: Hemisphere.

Hobfoll, S.E. and Lilly, R.S. (1993), Resource conservation as a strategy for community psychology. J. Community Psychol., 21: 128-148. doi:10.1002/1520-6629(199304)21:2<128::AID-JCOP2290210206>3.0.CO;2-5

Hobfoll, S. E. 2001a. The influence of culture, community, and the nested self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50: 337-370.

Hobfoll, S. E. 2001b. Conservation of resources: A rejoinder to the commentaries. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50: 419-421.

Originating area

Behavioral Sciences

Level of analysis


IS articles that use the theory

Chen, S., Westman, M., & Eden, D. (2009). Impact of enhanced resources on anticipatory stress and adjustment to new information technology: A field-experimental test of conservation of resources theory. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(3), 219–230. [3]

Ferguson, M., Carlson, D., Boswell, W., Whitten, D., Butts, M. M., and Kacmar, K. M. 2016. “Tethered to Work: A Family Systems Approach Linking Mobile Device

Giumetti, G. W., Hatfield, A. L., Scisco, J. L., Schroeder, A. N., Muth, E. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (2013). What a Rude E-Mail ! Examining the Differential Effects of Incivility Versus Support on Mood , Energy , Engagement , and Performance in an Online Context. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 18(3), 297–309. [4]

Harris, K. J., Harris, R. B., Carlson, J. R., and Carlson, D. S. 2015. “Resource Loss from Technology Overload and Its Impact on Work-family conflict: Can Leaders Help?,” Computers in Human Behavior (50), pp. 411 417. [5]

Park, Y., Fritz, C., & Jex, S. M. (2016). Daily Cyber Incivility and Distress : The Moderating Roles of Resources at Work and Home. XX(X), 1–23. [6]

Links from this theory to other theories


External links

A Brief Review of the Conservation of Resources Theory as it Applies to Military Trauma can be found in : [7]

An infographic of COR theory is provided by NRC Health at : [8]

IGI Global offers a definition at : [9]

Wikipedia offers an overview at [10]

Original Contributor(s)

Geethika Raj