23
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − == Adaptive Enterprise Architecture Theory ==+ − − − + + − + − + − + − + − + + + + + − Outer layer: The adapting capability involves context awareness, enterprise architecture assessment, rationalisation, realisation, and unrealisation of changes for adaptation. The adapting capability includes: scan and sense, interpret and analyse, decide and respond to internal and external changes (data-driven adaptability). The adapting capability in the outer layer initially identifies the change requirements (initiatives or ideas) that may initiate 1 or many projects. These project(s) initiatives or ideas can be further defined and handled through the inner layer via integrated engagement and governance. Deferred or low priority changes are pushed to unrealisation, which can be pulled again and reprioritized for realisation, if required. Inner layer: This includes defining, operating, managing and supporting the integrated adaptive enterprise architecture capability for handling the change for adaptation via identified projects from the outer layer. + − + + + + + + + + + + + + + + − + − + + + + + + + + + + + Line 59:
Line 85: + + − + Line 94:
Line 122: − + − + − + − + + − + − +
Adaptive enterprise architecture theory (view source)
Revision as of 03:07, 12 July 2021
, 03:07, 12 July 2021→Diagram/schematic of theory: Added AEA theory application example
=='''Adaptive enterprise architecture theory'''==
== '''Adaptive enterprise architecture theory''' ==
----
----
== Acronym ==
==Acronym==
AEA
== Alternate name(s)==
==Alternate name(s)==
Agile Enterprise Architecture, Adaptive Enterprise Design
Agile Enterprise Architecture, Adaptive Enterprise Design
== Main dependent construct(s)/factor(s)==
==Main dependent construct(s)/factor(s)==
== Main independent construct(s)/factor(s) ==
==Main independent construct(s)/factor(s)==
== Concise description of theory ==
==Concise description of theory==
Adaptive enterprise architecture theory, sometimes abbreviated to AEA, involves adapting, defining, operating, managing and supporting (ADOMS) enterprise architecture design (Gill 2015). The focus of design is on the design of adaptive enterprise as an "adaptive enterprise service system" operating in the networked and connected ecosystem (system of systems).
Adaptive enterprise architecture theory, sometimes abbreviated to AEA, involves adapting, defining, operating, managing and supporting (ADOMS) enterprise architecture design (Gill 2015). The focus of design is on the design of adaptive enterprise as an "adaptive enterprise service system" operating in the networked and connected ecosystem (system of systems).
The AEA theory provides the ADOMS approach, which is organized into two layers: outer layer and inner layer. The outer layer presents the adapting capability and the inner layer presents the defining, operating, managing, and supporting capabilities. The integrated inner and outer capabilities collectively define the “ADOMS” approach for the adaptive enterprise architecture. The outer layer identifies and feeds the adaptation changes (threat and opportunities) to inner layer. The inner layer handles the changes through the integrated engagement and governance.
'''Focus:'''
The AEA theory focuses on the data-driven capability to "continuously '''scan and sense''' the internal and external environment for '''data''' about known and unknown events (complex event processing), changes or disruptions, '''interpret and analyse''' the collected data, and '''decide and respond''' based on intuition and rationale to expected and unexpected changes (threats and or opportunities) for adaptations".
'''Approach:'''
The AEA theory includes the ADOMS approach, which is organized into two layers: outer layer and inner layer. The outer layer presents the adapting capability and the inner layer presents the defining, operating, managing, and supporting capabilities. The integrated inner and outer capabilities collectively define the “ADOMS” approach for the adaptive enterprise architecture. The outer layer identifies and feeds the adaptation changes (threat and opportunities) to inner layer. The inner layer handles the changes through the integrated engagement and governance.
== Diagram/schematic of theory ==
Outer layer: The adapting capability involves context awareness, enterprise architecture assessment, rationalisation, realisation, and unrealisation of changes for adaptation. The adapting capability includes: scan and sense, interpret and analyse, decide and respond to internal and external changes (data-driven adaptability). The adapting capability in the outer layer initially identifies the change requirements (initiatives or ideas) that may initiate 1 or many projects. These project(s) initiatives or ideas can be further defined and handled through the inner layer via integrated engagement and governance. Deferred or low priority changes are pushed to unrealisation, which can be pulled again and reprioritized for realisation, if required.
Inner layer: This includes defining, operating, managing and supporting the integrated adaptive enterprise architecture capability for handling the change for adaptation via identified projects from the outer layer.
==Diagram/schematic of theory==
[[File:Adaptive_Enterprise_Architecture_Theory.png]]
[[File:Adaptive_Enterprise_Architecture_Theory.png]]
Source: Gill, A.Q. (2015). Adaptive Cloud Enterprise Architecture. ''World Scientific Publishing''.
Source: Gill, A.Q. (2015). Adaptive Cloud Enterprise Architecture. ''World Scientific Publishing''.
==Application of theory==
The AEA theory can be applied to study and be embedded in the design of existing and new enterprise architecture frameworks. Following is an example of an AEA framework, which is organized into interaction, human, technology, facility, environment and security architecture viewpoints with overarching AEA theory elements (scan & sense, interpret & analyse, design & respond). Interaction centric viewpoint specifies the interactions between the human, technology, facility and environment elements. Human centric viewpoint specifies the business, information, social and professional architecture elements. Technology centric viewpoint specifies the application, data, platform and infrastructure elements. Facility centric viewpoint specifies the spatial, energy, HVAC (heating, ventilation and air conditioning) and ancillary elements. Environment centric viewpoints specifies the political, economic, social, technological, environmental and legal elements. Security is an overarching concern or viewpoint that considers AEA elements as assets and focuses on their resilience based on asset value and risk to such value.
<br />
[[File:Adaptive EA Framework.jpg|alt=Adaptive EA Framework Example|none|thumb|Adaptive EA Framework Example]]
Source: Gill, A.Q. (2015). Adaptive cloud enterprise architecture. ''World Scientific Publishing''.
Source: Gill, A.Q., Beydoun, G., Niazi, M. and Khan, H.U. (2020). Adaptive architecture and principles for securing the IoT systems. ''International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing'', ''Springer''.
== Originating author(s) ==
==Originating author(s)==
Asif Qumer Gill
Asif Qumer Gill
== Seminal articles ==
==Seminal articles==
Haeckel, S.H., (1999). Adaptive enterprise: Creating and leading sense-and-respond organizations. ''Harvard business press''.
Qumer, A. and Henderson-Sellers, B. (2006). Measuring agility and adaptibility of agile methods: A 4 dimensional analytical tool. In ''The IADIS international conference on applied computing 2006''. IADIS Press.
Wilkinson, M. (2006). Designing an ‘Adaptive’ Enterprise Architecture. ''BT Technology Journal, 24''(4), 81–92.
Qumer, A. and Henderson-Sellers, B. (2008). An evaluation of the degree of agility in six agile methods and its applicability for method engineering. ''Information and software technology'', ''50''(4), pp.280-295.
Yu E., Deng S., Sasmal D. (2012).Enterprise Architecture for the Adaptive Enterprise – A Vision Paper. ''In: Aier S., Ekstedt M., Matthes F., Proper E., Sanz J.L. (eds) Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research and Practice-Driven Research on Enterprise Transformation. PRET 2012, TEAR 2012''. ''Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg''.
Gill, A.Q. (2013). Towards the Development of an Adaptive Enterprise Service System Model. ''Proceedings of the Nineteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems'', ''Chicago, Illinois''.
Gill, A.Q. (2013). Towards the Development of an Adaptive Enterprise Service System Model. ''Proceedings of the Nineteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems'', ''Chicago, Illinois''.
Alzoubi, Y.I., & Gill, A.Q. (2020). An Empirical Investigation of Geographically Distributed Agile Development: The Agile Enterprise Architecture Is a Communication Enabler. ''IEEE Access'', 80269-80289.
Alzoubi, Y.I., & Gill, A.Q. (2020). An Empirical Investigation of Geographically Distributed Agile Development: The Agile Enterprise Architecture Is a Communication Enabler. ''IEEE Access'', 80269-80289.
Proper, H. A., Guédria, W. and Sottet, J.S. (2020). Enterprise Modelling in the Digital Age. I''n V. Kulkarni, S. Reddy, T. Clark, and B. S. Barn, editors, Advanced Digital Architectures for Model-Driven Adaptive Enterprises, IGI Global, Hershey, Pennsylvania,'' 46-67.
Srinivas, S., Gill, A.Q., & Roach, T. (2021). Can Business Architecture Modeling be Adaptive? ''IT Professional'', ''23''(2), 81-88.
Srinivas, S., Gill, A.Q., & Roach, T. (2021). Can Business Architecture Modeling be Adaptive? ''IT Professional'', ''23''(2), 81-88.
== IS articles that use the theory ==
==IS articles that use the theory==
Gill, A., Smith, S., Beydoun, G. & Sugumaran, V. (2014). Agile enterprise architecture: a case of a cloud technology-enabled government enterprise transformation. ''Proceeding of the 19th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems'', ''Chengdu, China''.
Gill, A., Smith, S., Beydoun, G. & Sugumaran, V. (2014). Agile enterprise architecture: a case of a cloud technology-enabled government enterprise transformation. ''Proceeding of the 19th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems'', ''Chengdu, China''.
Anwar, M.J., Gill, A.Q. (2019). A Review of the Seven Modelling Approaches for Digital Ecosystem Architecture. ''IEEE 21st Conference on Business Informatics'', ''Moscow, Russia''.
Anwar, M.J., Gill, A.Q. (2019). A Review of the Seven Modelling Approaches for Digital Ecosystem Architecture. ''IEEE 21st Conference on Business Informatics'', ''Moscow, Russia''.
== Originating area ==
==Originating area==
Information Systems
Information Systems
== Level of analysis ==
==Level of analysis==
Design of an enterprise, ecosystem
Design of a service, capability, enterprise, ecosystem
== Links from this theory to other theories ==
==Links from this theory to other theories==
[[Dynamic capabilities]], [[Evolutionary theory]], [[General systems theory]], [[Competitive strategy (Porter)]]
== External links ==
==External links==
== Original Contributor(s) ==
==Original Contributor(s)==